Which of these is NOT a type of motion in parliamentary procedure?

In parliamentary procedure, different types of motions serve specific purposes to facilitate organized and effective meetings. The types typically recognized include privileged motions, main motions, and subsidiary motions.

A privileged motion is one that is of such importance that it can interrupt the consideration of other business. It addresses urgent matters, such as a motion to adjourn. A main motion presents a proposal for group consideration and action. It serves as the primary way to introduce new business. A subsidiary motion, on the other hand, is used to modify or affect the main motion that is currently being discussed, providing a way to change its direction or details.

The term "disruptive motion" is not recognized in parliamentary procedure. It suggests a type of motion that would cause chaos or interruptions without following the structured approach that parliamentary rules establish. Therefore, this answer captures the essence of the question by clarifying that "disruptive motion" does not fit within the established framework of motions used in formal meetings, as it lacks clear procedural legitimacy and purpose.